Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mika Dagan Fruchtman vs Jessica Hinojosa Gomez Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fruchtman vs Gomez analysis and find out who is favored!
Mika Dagan Fruchtman vs Jessica Hinojosa Gomez Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fruchtman 1 - 0 Gomez
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fruchtman has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Gomez has won 40.55%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fruchtman, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gomez has won 56.35%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 38.11% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fruchtman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gomez has saved 45.45% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fruchtman has won 20% of matches played (W/L 1/ 4), with Gomez winning 42.42% (W/L 14/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fruchtman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 16/ 12), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 37/ 41). Gomez has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 15/ 11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 46/ 62).
- Player level: In the last year, Fruchtman has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 1/ 4), where as Gomez has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.42% of matches (W/L 14/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fruchtman winning 1 times and Gomez being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Fruchtman winning 2 and Gomez winning 0. The last match between Fruchtman and Gomez was at the W15 Cancun, 01-10-2022, Semifinals, Hard with Mika Dagan Fruchtman getting the victory 6-0 7-6(3).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:18:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fruchtman and Gomez have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fruchtman winning 0 times and Gomez 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Fruchtman winning 1, and Gomez 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fruchtman has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Gomez has played against players with an average rank of 225.15.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fruchtman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gomez has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fruchtman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gomez has converted 40.54% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
894
Rank
771
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
804
Rank
679
High
26
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
50% (53-53)
Career Total W/L
46% (61-73)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
31% (4-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mika Dagan Fruchtman | Jessica Hinojosa Gomez |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:18:0 | 2:18:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (48/70) | 82% (58/71) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (32/48) | 47% (27/58) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 32% (7/22) | 23% (3/13) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Points W% | 58% (41/71) | 44% (31/70) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
82%
(
58 of
71)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
0
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
41 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mika Dagan Fruchtman | Jessica Hinojosa Gomez |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 31% (4/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 38% (12/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 44% (124/158) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.04 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 5 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.42 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 58 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:37:33 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 208.77 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 61% (450/741) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 54% (243/450) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (118/291) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 41% (45/111) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (354/782) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 31% (4/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (4/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 40% (5/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (5/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 25% (8/2) |
Mika Dagan Fruchtman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kiara Cvetkovic
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michaela Laki
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
21 of
32)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Natsuho Arakawa
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
67%
(
71 of
106)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
6
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Julaluck Sae-Eung
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanni Liu
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Chompoothip Jandakate
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Nikita Liebkind
73%
(
55 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
11
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
51%
(
38 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Natcharee Teerachodjiranon
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
7
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Simona Ogescu
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
17 of
29)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
59%
(
13 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
39
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Sahaja Yamalapalli
Player
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
Player
Carolina Bohrer Martins
70%
(
61 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
39 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
46 of
82)
94
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katarina Kozarov
Player
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
73%
(
63 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
73)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
10
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
92
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
41%
(
13 of
32)
1st Serve %
38%
(
17 of
45)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
8
77%
(
10 of
13)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
10 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miriana Tona
Player
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariana Isabel Higuita Barraza
Player
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
53%
(
37 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
16)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
51%
(
36 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
Player
Carol Zhao
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
0
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
11
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Kononova
Player
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 1-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-3 10-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Fruchtman Vs Gomez Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
